《Building in China》简介：

Building in China is about striking an architectural balance between the pull of monumental tradition and the push of technological novelty. Centering on the dynamic period of post-imperial and pre-Communist China, the book focuses on the building and city planning initiatives of Henry Murphy. A little-known American architect, Murphy ventured to China in 1914 to design a campus for the Yale-in-China program and found himself captivated by the question of how to preserve China's rich architectural traditions while also designing new buildings using up-to-date Western technologies. Murphy's buildings were compromises in a tumultuous society facing an uncertain future. Inadvertently they became political emblems, as Chinese rulers such as Chiang Kai-shek and Sun Yat-sen's son called on Murphy for city planning advice to complement their hopes for urban reconstruction.

There are few serious studies of Western architects in the 20th century who practiced in non-Western contexts, and this book make significant contributions to the fields of both American and Chinese architectural history. Those interested in city planning or urban history, post-colonialist theory, comparative Asian studies, the history of technology or historic preservation practice will find this book breaking new ground by analyzing fresh evidence.

《Building in China》摘录：

The second issue Murphy sought to clarify during his Beijing visit was to what extent he faced stiff competition from Harry Hussey (Figure 14), the architect for Peking Union Medical College, then under construction in the capital. Hussey and Murphy intensely mistrusted one another. As Murphy toured sites for future work in East China during the summer of 1918, Hussey became Murphy’s nemesis. When Hussey learned of Murphy’s plans to establish an office in China, he boasted that there was not enough work in China to warrant the two of them and that he would “drive Murphy out,” as Hussey had tried to do with the IBC commission. Retaliating, Murphy told Dana that everyone “shared a low opinion of that erratic person’s methods.” Furthermore, Murphy was confident that even if his own practice w...